This interpretation explains for example the linear relationship of the oscillator strength of the lowest excited state with system size in the case of some conjugated organic polymers (see e.g. this paper): If there are more electrons available to oscillate, then the transition strength increases.

The oscillator strength f

_{ij}between two non-degenerate states i and j is defined (in atomic units) as two thirds of the squared transition dipole moment multiplied by the energy gap

```
```

where the vector **r**contains all 3N spatial coordinates of the N electrons

The Thomas-Reiche-Kuhn sum rule now states that the sum over the oscillator strengths from one state i to all possible other states is equal to the number of electrons in the system, i.e.

In particular, if we consider excitations from the ground state, then all oscillator strengths are positive. Which means that the oscillator strengths can in fact be viewed as a partitioning of the number of electrons.

The derivation of this sum rule starts by realizing that the momentum operator with respect to any spatial coordinate x of any particle (e.g. x=y

_{2}) is given as the commutator of the Hamiltonian with this coordinate

This follows whenever H is of the form

where clearly the derivatives with respect to x are the only part, which does not commute with x itself

By applying the product rule twice, the first term of this expression becomes

And in summary

The remaining proof follows what is shown here (sorry that I am switching the notation, but I copy-and-pasted a little bit ...). First one realizes that the commutator of x and p

_{x}is equal to i

Then one expands the commutators and inserts a resolution of the identity over the eigenstates of the Hamiltonian

Insert the above expression for p

_{x}

The commutators are evaluated by letting H act either on the bra or the ket, which results in a multiplication with the respective eigenvalue. And after summing together the equivalent terms one obtains

The actual

**r**vector was composed of 3N individual electron coordinates. The above equation holds for each of these coordinates. Thus, in summary:

which is just what we wanted to show.

## 2 comments:

Hi Felix,

Random question. What is the physical significant of the transition dipole moment operator?

Hi, it is not so easy to put that into one sentence. But the idea is: If you look at the interactions of an oscillating electric field (i.e. light) with a molecule, you will find out that the transition dipole moment is the dominant quantity determining the strength of the interaction.

Post a Comment